What the research profiles of this year's 2 incoming residents actually look like, by specialty relevance, authorship, and notable activity, not just publication count.
Program Director: Dr. Justin Lee
Source: CaRMS program descriptions
Selection weights not published
In file review, research is described as interest and aptitude for academic work, helpful but not an absolute requirement, and at interview scholarly activities include research, teaching, quality, and patient safety work in radiation oncology or other areas.
Estimate calculated as 0 applicants at a 76 percent invite rate to 50 applicants at a 100 percent invite rate. It is not an interview count stated by the program, and the low end is not useful on its own.
The program does not publish exact weights, and research has no separate weight. With 76 to 100 percent of applicants invited, research is unlikely to decide who gets an interview, and if it matters at all, it is more likely to matter in final ranking.
Gaps: The program does not state an interview count or rank list size, and only a CMG stream with a quota of 2 was listed.
Both residents in this cohort are Canadian medical graduates. Schools are shown as a set only and are not matched to the individual profiles below.
Neither resident in this cohort matched with radiation oncology publications. One brought a small, fully first or second authored record in other fields, and the other brought no publications at all but had direct involvement in cancer research alongside specialty mentors and a long-running leadership project.
At n=2 this is not a rule, but it is a useful reminder that in a specialty this small, early exposure, mentorship, and leadership can carry a profile as much as a publication count does. Program weightings may change from year to year.
All data on this page was gathered from publicly available sources and verified to a high but not absolute degree of confidence. This profile is intended to give prospective applicants a general sense of what previously matched residents looked like, not to serve as a definitive or exhaustive record.
Featured in this profile?
Tell us which card and which line, and we'll take a look.
Request an Edit