What the research profiles of this year's 3 incoming residents actually look like, by specialty relevance and notable activity, not just publication count.
Program Director: Dr. Megan Cashin
Source: CaRMS program descriptions
Selection weights not published
Research is looked at during file review, as interest in scholarly activity and the ability to complete projects, and again at interview, as interest and ability to complete the scholarly part of training.
Research has no separate published weight here. It appears in file review and at interview, inside broader assessments. With a high invite rate, most applicants whose files are reviewed are invited, so research is more likely to matter in final ranking than in whether an interview is offered. The program does not publish exact weights, so no research share can be assigned.
Gaps: The page does not publish selection weights or an annual interview count, and the per candidate interview timing it describes is not an interview total.
All three residents in this cohort are Canadian medical graduates. Schools are shown as a set only and are not matched to the individual research profiles below, since with a cohort this small that pairing would make individuals identifiable.
* This paper is dated after match day. It was most likely listed on the original application as in preparation or pending publication at the time of the match, which is worth keeping in mind when benchmarking against this profile.
Confirmed research volume was low across this cohort. One resident has a first-authored orthopedic imaging study, one has a single third-author paper outside orthopedics, and one has no confirmed publications, so published research was not a visible feature of every profile in this year's match.
A cohort of 3 is too small to show a stable pattern, and public sources only capture what is indexed, so read this as one year's snapshot rather than a benchmark. Program weightings may change from year to year.
All data on this page was gathered from publicly available sources and verified to a high but not absolute degree of confidence. This profile is intended to give prospective applicants a general sense of what previously matched residents looked like, not to serve as a definitive or exhaustive record.
Featured in this profile?
Tell us which card and which line, and we'll take a look.
Request an Edit